Monday, January 16, 2012

Martin Luther King Day... better than naming a road after him...


This brief article from the Heritage Foundation demonstrates the right way to build on the King legacy...

Life-Changing Tribute to Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

The greatest tribute to the legacy of Martin Luther King, Jr., is not to name a street in his honor or celebrate a national holiday. It is to recognize and support those who are working to carry out his vision, those who empower those facing the greatest obstacles through personal relationships that restore the fabric of civil society—without the need for federal government intervention.

As former Housing and Urban Development Secretary Jack Kemp once said, “We need an anti-poverty agenda based on democratic capitalism, not socialism and on private ownership, not government control. Our definition of compassion is not how many people live on the government welfare plantation, but how many of our people are liberated from government dependence.”

Among those ranks of individuals who are carrying out Dr. King’s vision are three young men—Curtis Monroe, Michael Toland, and Roger Marshall—who give their time, talents, and earnings from their day jobs serving as coaches and mentors of at-risk youths in the Benning Terrace public housing development in Washington, D.C.

The investment by this trio of volunteers is, in fact, an act of longstanding gratitude and reciprocity. Two of them grew up in Benning Terrace, and their childhood and adolescence was spent in a war-torn environment in which a familiar face would vanish from the neighborhood nearly every other month as the victim of gang violence.

Fifteen years ago, the lives of Monroe and Toland were salvaged and their futures reclaimed when a cadre of friends who called themselves the Alliance of Concerned Men felt called to intervene after the violence reached a shocking climax: The body of a 12-year-old boy who had been shot execution-style was discovered in a frozen ravine.

The members of the Alliance had at one time been involved with crime, drugs, and violence, but each life had been transformed. Because they were familiar with the day-to-day dangers of life in the inner city and were well-versed in the gang subculture, they readily won the youths’ attention and respect. Through meetings at the Center for Neighborhood Enterprise, they developed a plan of action. They shared information with grassroots counterparts who had successfully worked with gang members in other parts of the country. They also connected with David Gilmore, the D.C. housing director at the time, who saw the potential of the intervention and offered to provide jobs for youths who would lay down their weapons.

Warring gang members seized the opportunity to exit the cycle of violence and willingly took on jobs ranging from graffiti removal to landscaping and building repairs. The neighborhood was transformed from a wasteland into a thriving community. There was not a single gang-related death for the next 10 years.

Today, Monroe, Toland, and Marshall, who experienced that transformation firsthand, are investing in a third generation of Benning Terrace kids. Their coaching goes far beyond how to pass a football or block a defender, as they serve as moral mentors and confidantes. Their investment is critical for the futures of each of the youths they work with.

These volunteers also hold weekly group counseling sessions. At a recent gathering, seven of eight participants reported that their fathers were in jail. Statistics show that adolescents who do not live in intact families are more likely to engage in crime and delinquent activity and risky behavior and are less likely to succeed in school. But Monroe, Toland, and Marshall have refused to relegate the young people of Benning Terrace to the ranks of a “lost generation.” They are available on a 24/7 basis for kids who are in need, and they serve as surrogate big brothers and dads, taking them out for pizza after their football games and going to their schools to consult with their teachers.

These men are rebuilding civil society, demonstrating the concern and care for individuals at a personal level that is most effective in transforming behavior and meeting people’s needs.

They exhibit the power of presence—a sharp contrast to the impersonal efforts of government programs or over-reliance on curfews and cameras. Part of a nationwide network, these dedicated community leaders are proving that it is possible to counter the odds of poverty and disadvantage. Instead of surrendering young people to another cycle of generational poverty and accompanying government dependency, these community healers are demonstrating a realistic neighborhood-based alternative to government intervention. Policymakers should take note of the innovation and success of grassroots efforts like Benning Terrace in addressing the social breakdown that so often causes poverty, crime, and community devastation.

Their investment is truly a powerful, living, and longlasting tribute to the vision and sacrifice of Dr. King.

Robert L. Woodson, Sr., is the founder and president of the Center for Neighborhood Enterprise located in Washington, D.C. The Heritage Foundation works closely with Mr. Woodson and the center on conservative anti-poverty strategy.

Tuesday, January 3, 2012

Happy New Year!!!

It is our fondest wish that you have had a wonderful holiday season with family, loved ones, and friends. We wish you a New Year of Hope, Love, Charity, and Prosperity.

May we all work hard this year to better our communities and our nation. It is our hope that we may act in a way that brings our nation closer to the will of God and that we may honor Him with the decisions we make this year.

Our very best,

Bruce and Debra Hough




Monday, November 14, 2011

How President Obama Killed Thousands of Jobs

Below is a brief article by the Heritage Foundation. It is another example of how ridiculous this President is behaving. Private money, funding a private project, producing thousands if not tens of thousands of jobs (especially when you consider the multiplier effect), helping the U.S. energy situation by actually getting oil from a friendly neighbor to the north rather than from our enemies... what is it about this that doesn't make sense? Even the environmental impact study finds no compelling reason to halt this project. So Obama punts... delaying a project that is truly shovel ready and without using OUR money!!! Another reason why Barack Obama must be a one term president. Read below...

If Americans needed any further proof that the Obama Administration is one of the most political on record, or that, for all the recent demagoguing, it really cares only about re-election, not about job creation, then you need look no further than its cynical Keystone XL oil pipeline decision last week.

Over the last several months, radical environmentalists along with Hollywood celebrity activists descended on the White House in protest, urging President Barack Obama to block the construction of the $7 billion pipeline that would bring in more than 700,000 barrels of oil per day from Alberta, Canada, to the Texas Gulf coast. Last week, they got their wish.

The Obama Administration on Thursday announced that it would delay a decision on the pipeline until after the 2012 election. In siding with his leftist environmentalist, big Hollywood base, President Obama's ambition is nakedly apparent, as is his total disregard for the 14 million unemployed Americans sitting on the sidelines, waiting for Washington to get out of the way so they can get back to work. And it also shows that for him, politics is more important than achieving true energy independence for the United States.

And here's why: The Keystone pipeline would have done what the President's hundreds of billions of dollars in stimulus spending failed to do. It would have created thousands of jobs (tens of thousands, by some predictions), while generating $5.2 billion in property tax revenue for Montana, South Dakota, Kansas, Oklahoma, Nebraska, and Texas. And it would have done it all with private dollars--not taxpayer dollars.

The kicker is that despite all the hoopla from the enviro-celebrity protests, this pipeline should have been anything but controversial, even by the Obama Administration's own findings. Heritage's Nicolas Loris explains:

Radical environmentalists act as if this is the first oil pipeline being built in the United States. We have 50,000 miles of oil pipeline in this country that have provided massive economic benefits with minimal environmental harm.

In short, building the Keystone XL pipeline is nothing new, and it’s one of the most environmentally sensible ways to transport oil. Even the Obama Administration determined it to be safe when the State Department’s recent Environmental Impact Statement found that the pipeline would pose few environmental risks.

Another important point is that even if the Keystone pipeline isn't constructed in the United States, the resource will still be tapped, and it's going to head elsewhere. Heritage's David Kreutzer explains that the development of Canada's oil sands will be slowed (thereby increasing its cost), and it will be diverted to non-U.S. consumers, meaning that the Canadian oil will be shipped across thousands of miles of ocean to Chinese refineries. Kreutzer's admonition to the Obama Administration?

So, block the XL pipeline if you think the environment will be better served by shipping Canadian oil an extra 6,000 miles across the Pacific in oil-consuming super tankers and then refining it in less-regulated Chinese refineries. In addition, be aware that replacing the Canadian oil means the U.S. also must import more oil by tankers, which are less efficient than pipelines.

The facts, though, don't matter to environmentalist activists. They don't matter to certain celebrities, and now they apparently don't matter to the Obama Administration, either. Evidently, neither do jobs or energy independence. Following the President's decision, actor Robert Redford applauded Obama and said, "This is American democracy at its best: a president who listens to the voice of the people and shows the courage to do what's right for the country." No, Mr. Redford, you're wrong. When the President puts his job over those of tens of thousands Americans, that is politics and a presidency at its worst.

Thursday, October 13, 2011

Footloose the Movie Starring Julianne Hough








Okay, Footloose also stars Kenny Wormald as Ren; Dennis Quaid as Reverend Moore; Miles Teller as Willard; Andy McDowell as Ariel's Mom, Vi; Ziah Colon as Rusty etc. But none of them are related to me, so don't you think I should give Julianne top billing? Yeah, I thought so...

Utah made a bid for this film,(I'm sure they wanted to recreate the movie magic of the original film shot in 1984 at the Lehi Roller Mills), and Craig Brewer who directed and lives in Memphis tried to get it made in Memphis… but Georgia just gave away too many incentives. Living in Utah, it would have been fun to have my little girl working in-state for a change.

I was a big fan of the original for all the reasons you might expect..great soundtrack and great dancing. Kevin Bacon was totally awesome and I really liked Dianne Wiest as long-suffering but wise wife of the overbearing Reverend Moore. In the updated film, I liked the fact that the role of Reverend Moore wasn’t as caricatured with Quaid as it was with Lithgoe. It was more about protecting children from harm than over zealous religiosity. Today's version also provided better context to explain the relationship between Ariel and her father.

I actually like Ren's back story in today's film better. It made him more sympathetic and I especially liked the interaction with his uncle played terrifically by Ray McKinnon. (you may remember him as the suitor to George Clooney's wife in "O Brother Where Art Thou", another favorite of mine.) Miles Teller as Willard didn't steal the show, but he delivered a performance that with weaker leads would have overwhelmed them with his appeal. He was great. And can I say that the Teller scene with Ren's nieces is one of the best new scenes in the movie.

When my wife and I saw a sizzle reel of the movie before it was finally edited, we saw the scene where Ren gets off the bus... tosses his duffel over his shoulder, puts on his sunglasses... and immediately knew this kid had his "cool" on. My wife gave a little swoon to confirm that the girls will definitely like this boy. And, oh by the way... he can DANCE! Big Time!

I’ve seen the movie three times (including the premier in L.A.) and every audience (including the usually jaded L.A. crowd) loved it… lots of interaction between the audience and film.

Oh and Julianne? She did make me tear up at least twice in the film… you can probably guess where when you see it. That should say enough about how I felt about her performance. Yes, I am a very proud papa.




Doing a remake is always problematic… but I believe Director/Writer Brewer and Co-Writer (and original author) Dean Pritchord were able to effectively honor the past and still make the new film appropriately contemporary for today’s audience.

I hope you get a chance to see it... I'm going again at a theater near me.


P.S. My boy Derek played Ren on the West End in London and through out Great Britain to rave reviews a few years back... and Julianne's sisters all danced in the country line dance sequence in the movie as well... just look for the blondes!

Wednesday, September 7, 2011

Obama's Long, Hot Summer

Now that Labor Day is behind us, the real political season begins for the race to the Presidency. But the summer season has not been kind to President Obama... but actually it wasn't summer's fault, and it wasn't even George Bush's fault... the fault falls squarely on the shoulders of President Obama himself. His failure to face the reality is taking its toll and his once stratospheric popularity is now at ground level... and he is digging himself a hole that he won't be able to get out of if he doesn't make a 180 degree turn in policy. (I'm not holding my breath!)

Rick Wiley the RNC Political Director sent out a memorandum today that illustrates the reality on the ground regarding the President's decline in popularity in critical states that will help determine who will be the next President. Read below, or click the link.

MEMORANDUM
To: Interested Parties
From: Rick Wiley, RNC Political Director
Date: 9/7/11
RE: A Long, Hot Summer

It was a long, hot summer for President Obama, indeed.
Consumer confidence at its lowest point since 2009; a downgrade to the country’s credit rating; volatile markets; zero job growth in August... more than enough reasons to need a vacation, right? After the President’s poorly-received, taxpayer-funded, campaign bus tour through the Midwest, the heat on President Obama was so great that Martha’s Vineyard must have been a tempting destination. (According to a recent survey by Rasmussen Reports, Obama was one of only a third of Americans who took a vacation at all this summer.) Now that the summer is all but over, it might be helpful to point out to the Obama campaign the damage another few months of failed leadership has inflicted on his approval ratings.

Nationally, according to Gallup’s weekly tracking, Obama ended August with only 40% approving of the job he is doing – matching the lowest weekly approval of his Presidency. His job approval among Hispanics, younger voters (age 18-29), and women also matched their lowest levels of his Presidency, and barely a third (35%) of Independents give him a passing grade. Obama’s +8 approval margin at the end of May (50% approve, 42% disapprove) has turned into a -13 disapproval rate at the end of August (40% approve, 53% disapprove) resulting in a slide of 21 points.

The picture is just as bleak in critical presidential battleground states where President Obama’s approval ratings were already in dangerous territory before the summer, and have seen similar slides since then.

 In Michigan, between May 11th and August 16th, Obama’s approval rating slid 20 points from a -1 margin in May to a -21 margin in August.

 In Florida, the President’s approval rating slid 15 points from +8 in May to -7 in August.

 In North Carolina, the President’s approval rating slid 13 points from +5 in May to -8 in mid-July.

 In Pennsylvania, the President’s approval rating slid 11 points from even in May to -11 at the end of July.

 In Ohio, the President’s approval rating slid 8 points between May and July, falling from +4 to -4.

To make matters worse, yesterday Politico reported only 26% of voters in their most recent Battleground Poll said they would “definitely” vote for Obama next year. If the Obama campaign isn’t careful, this long hot summer could turn into a long cold winter. Fortunately, there will be plenty of warm places for the President to take vacations when that time comes.

http://www.gop.com/index.php/S=63a53c4b706338949e13f8dc0cdf7c32/political/comments/a_long_hot_summer/

Tuesday, July 5, 2011

Age, Mortality, Winning; or, my latest Wake-up Call

Sam is my 14 year old. He is the real caboose of the family, being 9 years behind his next nearest sibling. Virtually an only child in a family of 10 kids. He has a shock of shockingly red hair, freckles, and a winning smile… but now, his smile isn’t the only thing winning…

It was just a few years ago, that I would beg Sam to go run with me and his mother… “it’s too hard, it isn’t fun… etc.” I “schooled” him on the most basic of exercise activities and would be on my way back from a run when he had given up before even getting halfway…

Yesterday, I was reminded how far he has come in just a few years. He has developed a competitive attitude… he wants to do better than he did last time.

We decided at the last minute to enter the Annual July 4th Park City 5K. We got there just early enough to get our registration completed, pin our numbers on and head right to the starting line… there were about a thousand people there.

I started toward the back of the crowd explaining to Sam that being in the front wave would be counter-productive; everyone gets caught up in the moment and starts out too fast and it ends up being a stampede that I was not interested in participating in. Sam just looked at me and said, “you go ahead and go to the back, I’m staying up front…”. Wow, was that a wake-up call!

I did go to the back… I know my abilities and limitations… besides, I had my Garmin watch and I could time myself without having to be off the line at the beginning. Look, I knew Sam would “school” me time wise, but just that moment, when he asserted his independence (on Independence Day even!) to go out on his own in an event we were doing together (?), was a moment I hadn’t been looking forward to.

Don’t get me wrong, he wanted us to do this event together. He likes it when we play ball, ride, run, swim, lift, golf, water ski, snow ski, etc. together. But now, it became crystal clear that he didn’t need me to do these things with him … or at least he didn’t need me at the same starting or ending point.

And yes, he smoked me… took third in his age group and about 50th overall. Me, like all my athletic pursuits, I have simple goals… Finish, Finish Healthy, and don’t be last in my age group. I made it through each of these (and still managed to finish ahead of nearly half the crowd…).

I’ve known for a long time that he would be taller than me… (all you have to do is look at the length of his toes!) I’ve always known he would someday outperform me in many a physical test of strength, endurance, and ability. I just didn’t know that it would happen so soon, and in so many ways…

Truth is, I’m really proud of him. He hasn’t always displayed the natural gifts that many of his peers were born with, but he has kept after it and is getting better all the time. He is displaying Ambition, Assertiveness, Competitive Spirit, and a desire to do better than he did last time… That was his goal. He is achieving it. That is winning.

Getting better each outing may not be in the cards for me anymore… though I still have a bit of game left in me, but watching him progress makes my feeble attempts well worth it. I think maybe I need and want him to do things with me… For me, having Sam still wanting to do things with me, is me winning; even if it is at a different starting or endpoint.

Sunday, July 3, 2011

Independence Day, Not Just the 4th of July...



I like the 4th of July. I like the flags waving, breakfast in the park, parades, barbecues with the family, and fireworks. Most of all, I like to think about the Independence in Independence Day.

It could just as well been known as Treason Day depending on your perspective and loyalties. Think about it... for the days following Jefferson's delivery of the Declaration of Independence, members of the Continental Congress were in fact meeting to determine if they were to deliver notice to the British Government that they no longer required, needed, or wanted their "services". To do so would require quite simply a rebellion to throw off the British Monarchy and Parliamentary rule that did not recognize the colonists’ rights for self determination. It wasn't that the members of the Continental Congress wanted mob rule, they in fact believed in the rule of law and wanted it equally and fairly applied.

They wanted the independence that was the genesis of the American experiment that began when British and other western European citizens came to America for religious freedom.

Yes, freedom. The ability to choose. The God given spark that gives man the desire to be free; to pursue the principles of life, liberty, and happiness. These were not "rights" given by King George, in fact they are not "given" by any government to the people, they are inherent in each person. God given.

It is instructive to read the entire text of the Declaration of Independence*. First, Jefferson lays out the philosophy underlying the action of rebellion. These opening sentences are among the most important non-scriptural (some may even regard them as scriptural canon) text ever written. It tells the world why man is entitled to freedom.

Only after establishing the premise of man's inherent rights does Jefferson enumerate the many transgressions against the rights of the men and women living in America.

These 56 men risked all they had, including their lives, to sign this document we hold dear; which today we should refer to when we believe government has infringed the sovereignty of the people; a document we should read often and read to our children. (the full text is reprinted below)

I can't help but think about George Washington and the battles that ensued against all odds. His dignity and leadership were profound. McCullough's "1776" is a treatise that inspires the reader in understanding the hardships and impossible situations that the colonists overcame. It is indeed a miracle that the Revolutionary War was successful and opened the way for the world to see how a democratic Republic could and would be successful. It set the stage for dozens of nations to try the "experiment" themselves.

But even so, most of humanity has never lived in a free society, and most do not now. Rebellion and revolution to throw off the shackles of despotism do not usually result in what we have in America.

Though we still live in the freest land on earth we do have elements in our country and government who believe they know better than Jefferson and the other 55 men who signed the Declaration of Independence. Some believe those notions are antiquated and idealistic in the "real world". Some believe that government should "take care of its citizens" and that government extends certain rights and can therefore restrict them as well... Some believe the constitution is not relevant in this age of electronic communication, high technology, and a global society.

I am not one of those. I believe the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution are more relevant today than ever before. I believe that when we abandon principles to expediency and security that we lose our soul as a country, leading to a loss of our God given rights. When the people (and the states and local governments) abdicate to the federal government their rights, we are giving away that which we have no right to give away.

I feel blessed during this time of year and am reminded of the sacrifice our forefathers (and mothers, and sisters, and brothers...) have freely given. Our armed forces are unique in the world as a freer of people. We have provided more opportunity for freedom around the world than any military and any people in history. I am proud of them and all they do and I thank them for their service.

There is a song I used to sing as part of musical group I belonged to as a youth (I'm not saying I was good, but I was enthusiastic). I remember the lyric something like this..."Freedom is a word often heard today, but if you want to keep there's a price to pay, for each generation has to win it anew, 'cause it's not something handed down to you. Freedom isn't free. You've got to pay a price; you've got to sacrifice, for your liberty."

I think we are pretty lucky that most of us don't have to make the sacrifice of our armed forces and those who have died to protect us and our freedoms (our lives). But we can sacrifice our time and treasure(our fortunes) to support worthy causes (our sacred honor) that will help us guard against intrusive government and to support those who will represent us to protect the rights with which we are endowed.

Independence Day is more than the 4th of July... for us it is the acknowledgement that we are a free people and individuals endowed with unalienable rights by our creator... life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.



(* Yes, I know that a resolution by Richard Henry Lee from Virginia was adopted by the Continental Congress on July 2nd, 1776 stating that, “these United Colonies are, and of right ought to be, free and independent states....and that all political connection between them and The State of Great Britain is, and of right ought to be, totally dissolved.” However, it was the Declaration by Jefferson that eloquently established the legal and philosophical reasoning behind the July 2nd Resolution.)

Text of The Declaration of Independence




Adopted in Congress 4 July 1776



The Unanimous Declaration of the Thirteen United States of America
W hen, in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature and of nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.




W e hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former systems of government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over these states. To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid world.



He has refused his assent to laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
He has forbidden his governors to pass laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.




He has refused to pass other laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of representation in the legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.



He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.




He has dissolved representative houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.




He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the legislative powers, incapable of annihilation, have returned to the people at large for their exercise; the state remaining in the meantime exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.




He has endeavored to prevent the population of these states; for that purpose obstructing the laws for naturalization of foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migration hither, and raising the conditions of new appropriations of lands.




He has obstructed the administration of justice, by refusing his assent to laws for establishing judiciary powers.




He has made judges dependent on his will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.




He has erected a multitude of new offices, and sent hither swarms of officers to harass our people, and eat out their substance.



He has kept among us, in times of peace, standing armies without the consent of our legislature.



He has affected to render the military independent of and superior to civil power.



He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his assent to their acts of pretended legislation:



For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:



For protecting them, by mock trial, from punishment for any murders which they should commit on the inhabitants of these states:



For cutting off our trade with all parts of the world:



For imposing taxes on us without our consent:



For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of trial by jury:



For transporting us beyond seas to be tried for pretended offenses:



For abolishing the free system of English laws in a neighboring province, establishing therein an arbitrary government, and enlarging its boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule in these colonies:



For taking away our charters, abolishing our most valuable laws, and altering fundamentally the forms of our governments:



For suspending our own legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.



He has abdicated government here, by declaring us out of his protection and waging war against us.



He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burned our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.



He is at this time transporting large armies of foreign mercenaries to complete the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of cruelty and perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy of the head of a civilized nation.



He has constrained our fellow citizens taken captive on the high seas to bear arms against their country, to become the executioners of their friends and brethren, or to fall themselves by their hands.



He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavored to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian savages, whose known rule of warfare, is undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.



In every stage of these oppressions we have petitioned for redress in the most humble terms: our repeated petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.
Nor have we been wanting in attention to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence.They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, enemies in war, in peace friends.



W e, therefore, the representatives of the United States of America, in General Congress, assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the name, and by the authority of the good people of these colonies, solemnly publish and declare, that these united colonies are, and of right ought to be free and independent states; that they are absolved from all allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the state of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as free and independent states, they have full power to levey war, conclude peace, contract alliances, establish commerce, and to do all other acts and things which independent states may of right do. And for the support of this declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.

Sunday, June 19, 2011

Happy Fathers Day

I am very grateful for my father... Both of them.

My Father in Heaven for sending me here to experience life and to learn to love and obey him. I am grateful that he sent his son to atone for my sins so that I have the opportunity to return to Him. I love my Father in Heaven.

My father on earth will also be my father forever in our eternal family. But our time together here and now is what I am most grateful for. My dad and I did a lot of stuff together when I was growing up. He was a radio announcer so he was involved in a lot of things that allowed him to use his talents behind a microphone... He DJ'd dances, announced triple A baseball, the drag races, hydroplane races, and many a parade. This meant free entry to all kinds of venues for a young kid that had the curiosity and fearlessness to wander those venues in search of adventure and as many discarded beer and pop bottles I could redeem for a hamburger and a 7 Up soda. (my mother would have killed me if I'd had a cola).

I felt like we were buddies doing stuff itogether in a grown up world. I would run errands for the adults working those venues and felt like a contributor when they needed me. But most of the time dad did his thing and I did mine and then we had the drive home to talk about it or when we could do it again.

Dad got roped into teaching a class at Felts field for the local Civil Air Patrol and I signed up as a cadet. There was a lot that I enjoyed about the CAP, but most of all was the ride home when we stopped at the Taco Time for a tostada. (it seemed they were always playing "Judy in Disguise with Glasses" or "Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds!!!")

We did a lot of other stuff too... working in the yard and garden, water and snow skiing etc. But, in retrospect, the most important thing was, we just did stuff together.

People have called him Bob, Bobby, Bubblehead Bob, or the Voice of North Idaho, but I just call him dad... And, I love my dad, in part im sure because we did stuff together. Happy Dad's Day dad.

Saturday, June 18, 2011

"How to Elect a Democrat in Utah" and other remarks by Bruce R. Hough, during today's Utah State Republican Convention

Good afternoon….

My name is Bruce Hough, and I’m your National Committeeman representing you on the Republican National Committee. I bring you greetings from our Chairman Reince Priebus, who is doing a tireless and outstanding job doing precisely the things that need to be done to make Barack Obama a one term president.

20 years ago, I stood in front of a similar Convention and ended up serving four years as your State Republican Party Chairman. I was 19 when I was elected… okay, it only seemed like I was 19… but the truth be told… it still feels like I’m nineteen when I’m around the energy, passion, and conviction of like minded individuals.

It is Good to be here as a delegate, elected to represent our friends and neighbors at this convention. It is Better to be a Republican Delegate, where I know that on the fundamental issues we are in agreement more often than not; as Republicans we stand for something. But Best of all, we are Americans, gathered together out of a common concern to Protect the Republic, to elect men and women of good character who are capable of representing us. It is America and its constitutional ideals that allow us to freely associate in this good cause and to speak without fear for what we believe. For that I am most grateful.

For those of you who are new to this process and consider yourselves Tea Party activists or 9/12ers, congratulations on becoming engaged in a process that allows you to have a say in the direction of our communities, our state and our Nation. When I became active in politics, yes I actually remember the Goldwater campaign… we weren’t clever enough to have catchy names, but we became known as “movement conservatives” and helped usher in the Reagan era.

But isn’t it interesting that as much as we admire many wonderful but past politicians, that served our country well, that we don’t necessarily agree with everything they said or did. Let’s face it, Adams and Jefferson ran a very nasty campaign… it was just lucky they didn’t have television. The good news of course is that they became friends in their later years.

As much as I love Ronald Reagan, I disagreed with him on granting amnesty to illegal aliens, and now we know how that turned out.

But here is the thing… I agreed with Reagan more than I disagreed with him… and I am forever grateful that he was our president and accomplished the monumental good that occurred under his stewardship.

I disagreed with Bush one on breaking his pledge to not raising taxes. I disagreed with Bush two on Bailouts and the fact that he wouldn’t use a veto pen to help control spending. But I am still grateful that he was president and not Al Gore.
My point is, as former Utah Congressman Jim Hansen used to say, “you don’t shoot a race horse that wins 7 out of ten races…” Maybe your standard is 8 out 10… you need to decide… but let’s be careful to remember all that we do agree on rather than denigrate the character of those who faithfully serve us because we disagree on one or two issues.

Because on any day… I would still rather have a Republican in office who I agree with most of the time than a Democrat that supports the policies of the Democratic Party that are leading this country into an abyss. Yes, I know that some republicans have been participants with the democrats and have contributed to the mess we are in.

Now let me share with you some of my thoughts that should probably be titled, “How to Elect a Democrat in Utah”.

Because we win on the issues, it really comes down to what I call the three Ts.

Tone, Temperament, and Tactics.

The tone we take in our public discourse is telling about ourselves individually and about our party. It is one thing to disagree vehemently on an issue or policy; it is quite another to demonize the person who is expressing their viewpoint on that issue or policy. It gets back to what I learned as a child… the action or behavior or words are what we disagree with and may even condemn as an awful idea or inappropriate behavior; but we treat the person with respect and do not demonize or vilify that person.

A friend of mine just shared a story about his father and an important lesson he learned from him. His father told him that “If you are right, there is no reason to be angry; if you are wrong, you have no right to be angry.”

Our temperament, if angry, can get in the way of communicating our message. It makes it easy for others, including the media, to dismiss us outright if our temperament is always one of anger and who has the loudest voice. Do not confuse passion with anger. I believe that passion will persuade but anger will dissuade anyone from wanting to have a meaningful discourse with us.

Finally Tactics. We only need look at fairly recent history. How in the world did Democrat Bill Orton win a congressional seat in what was arguably the most republican district in the nation? Unfortunately, the tone, temperament and tactics of some in that race were such that the electorate would not return a Republican to a safe Republican seat in Congress. It started with the Republican’s beating each other up so unmercifully that by the time the general election came around and additional negative campaigning continued, the electorate had had it and elected a Democrat.

How did Jim Matheson get elected? Similar story, a very bitter primary. And then, to make matters worse, outside interests came into Utah placed negative advertising against the Democrat and the result? We have had 12 years of Jim Matheson. Outsiders, as good as their intentions are in coming here to “help” us elect good republicans… sometimes just don’t get it. Utah is different than the rest of the country. Hard hitting, personal attack ads that may work in other parts of the country do nothing but hurt our candidates here in Utah.

For me, I would love to see those who feel compelled to insert themselves into Utah’s political process to be for something rather than against something; especially in a primary season. And in both primary and general elections, keep it to the issues; avoid character assassination, or demonizing other candidates.
The success of the Republican Party producing good candidates and winning elections is more important than ever with our country in financial peril and our economy on the edge of the cliff.

We can be successful with the right tone, right temperament, and right tactics… because we are already right on the issues and right to have faith in our constitutional republic, this United States of America, which we hold so dear.

Thank you.

Friday, June 3, 2011

Obama Indicted... by the Numbers

The economy just isn't getting better... notwithstanding what the new head of the DNC says... sheesh... is she flailing for a response or what... see what I mean on the link below.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qRPHOT0GHCg&feature=youtu.be

Now, check out the facts below... this is a bigger indictment than today's John Edward's indictment! And, should be a bigger story... but alas, it seems not to the mainstream media.

2002: Last Year The Home Value Index Was As Low As It Is Now. (The Wall Street Journal, 5/31/11)

279: Points The Dow Jones Industrial Average Dropped Yesterday. (Dow Jones, Accessed 6/1/11)

9.1: The percent of unemployment announced everywhere today... yes it's an increase; it's poor job creation in the public sector, only 50,000 versus an expected 150,000.

8: Straight Months Home Prices Have Fallen. (MarketWatch, 5/31/11)

6.9: Points The Institute For Supply Management’s Index Of Manufacturing Fell In May. (The Washington Post, 6/1/11)

3.6: Percent Decrease In Home Prices Over The Last Year. (MarketWatch, 5/31/11)

$1.95: Increase In The Price Of Gas Since Obama Took Office. (Energy Information Administration, Accessed 6/1/11)

1.8: Percent Rate Of Growth For The U.S. Economy, A “Surprisingly Weak” Rate. (The New York Times, 5/31/11)


THEY JOIN THE REST OF THE OBAMA RECORD AND HIS PAINFUL LEGACY OF DEBT, UNEMPLOYMENT AND DESPAIR

$45.9 Trillion: Total Federal Spending Proposed By Obama’s FY2012 Budget Through 2021. (OMB, 2/14/11)

$26.3 Trillion: Projected Federal Debt In 2020 Due To Obama’s Binge Spending. (OMB, 2/14/11)

$14.3 Trillion: Current National Debt. (U.S. Treasury Department, Accessed 06/1/11)

$10.9 Trillion: Amount The Total Gross Federal Debt Will Increase By FY2021 According To Obama’s FY2012 Budget. (OMB, 2/14/11)

$9.5 Trillion: Cumulative Deficits Caused By President Obama’s Proposed Budget, FY2012-2021. (CBO, April 2011)

$6.0 Trillion: Total Interest Payments On The National Debt, FY2012-2021. (CBO, April 2011)

$3.7 Trillion: Amount Added To The National Debt Since Obama Took Office. (U.S. Treasury Department, Accessed 6/1/11)

$2.5 Trillion: True Cost Of ObamaCare Once Fully Implemented. (Sen. Max Baucus, Floor Remarks, 12/2/09)

$1.65 Trillion: Projected Federal Deficit For FY2011 – Will Be The Largest In U.S. History. (OMB, 2/14/11)

$1.42 Trillion: Federal Budget Deficit For FY2009 – Highest In U.S. History. (CBO, 10/7/10)

$1.29 Trillion: Federal Budget Deficit For FY2010 – Second Highest In U.S. History. (CBO, 10/7/10)

$1.14 Trillion: American Debt Held By China. (U.S. Treasury Department, Accessed 6/1/11)

$931 Billion: Net Interest Payment On Our National Debt In 2021 Due To Obama’s Budget. (CBO, April 2011)

$830 Billion: Price Tag Of Obama’s Failed Stimulus. (CBO, 5/25/11)

$575 Billion: Amount Of Medicare Cuts In ObamaCare. (CMS Chief Actuary Richard S. Foster, Memo, 4/22/10)

$569.2 Billion: Amount Of Taxes In ObamaCare. (Letter to Speaker Nancy Pelosi, 3/18/10)

$24 Billion: Stimulus Funds Sent To Tax Cheats. (Government Accountability Office, April 2011)
$16 Billion: Amount Obama Expects To Lost On Auto Bailouts. (Detroit News, 6/1/11)
$2.1 Billion: Amount Treasury Doesn’t Expect To Recover From Chrysler. (The Associated Press, 5/17/10)

44.6 Million: Number Of Americans Receiving Food Stamps. (The Wall Street Journal, 5/31/11)
$18 Million: Cost Of The Stimulus Website Recovery.org. (ABC News’ “The Note“ Blog, 7/8/09)
13.7 Million: Unemployed Americans. (Bureau of Labor Statistics, 5/6/11)

8.6 Million: Americans Working Part-Time For Economic Reasons. (Bureau of Labor Statistics, 5/6/11)

6.5 Million: Number Of Properties Receiving Foreclosure Filings Since Obama Took Office. (RealtyTrac, Accessed 6/1/11)
5.8 Million: Americans Unemployed For Longer Than 27 Weeks. (Bureau of Labor Statistics, 5/6/11)

3.8 Million: Increase In The Number Of People Who Were In Poverty In 2009 Over 2008. (NPR, 9/16/10)

3.1 Million: Number Of Workers Granted Waivers So That ObamaCare Would Not Outlaw Their Health Care Plan. (HHS.gov, Accessed 6/1/11)

1.8 Million: Jobs Lost Since Obama’s Stimulus Was Passed. (Bureau of Labor Statistics, Accessed 6/1/11)
1.3 Million: Private Sector Jobs Lost Since Stimulus Was Passed. (Bureau of Labor Statistics, Accessed 6/1/11)

989,000: Americans That Have Given Up Looking For Work. (Bureau of Labor Statistics, 5/6/11)

587,000: Avoided Foreclosure ThroughHAMP, Obama Had Promised To Help As Many As Nine Million. (Dow Jones Newswire, 5/6/11; President Obama, Remarks In Mesa, AZ, 2/18/09)

89,000: The Number Of Stimulus Checks Sent To Dead Or Incarcerated People. (The Wall Street Journal's Washington Wire" Blog, 10/7/10)

$46,000: Your Share Of The National Debt. (U.S. Treasury Department Accessed 6/1/11; U.S. Census Bureau, Accessed 6/1/11)

38,000: ADP Survey Of Private Sector Jobs Created In May. (NPR, 6/1/11)

23,000: The Number Of Jobs Obama Knew His Drilling Moratorium Would Kill. (The Wall Street Journal, 8/21/10)

3,700: Number Of Tax Deliquents Who Received Stimulus Funds. (Government Accountability Office, April 2011)

2020: Year That Medicare’s Trust Fund Will Be Exhausted. (CBO, March 18, 2011)
1,372: Number Of Waivers Granted To Unions And Businesses So That ObamaCare Would Not Outlaw Their Health Care Plans. (HHS.gov, Accessed 6/1/11)

1,000: Number Of Jobs Obama’s NLRB Is Trying To Kill In South Carolina. (The Denver Post, 5/2/11)

80: Percent Of Small Businesses That Could Be Forced To Change Health Care Plans As A Result Of ObamaCare. (The Washington Post, 6/15/10)
79: Percent Of Stimulus Funds For Wind, Solar And Geothermal Energy Projects That Went To Foreign Firms. (Investigating Reporting Workshop/ABC’s World News Tonight/Watchdog Institute, 2/8/10)

73: Percent Of Americans Disapprove Of Obama’s Handling Of Gas Prices. (CNN Poll, 5/24-26/11)

70: Rounds Of Golf Played By President Obama Since Taking Office. (CBS News' Mark Knoller’s Twitter Feed, 5/30/11)

64: Percent Of Americans Disapprove Of Obama’s Handling Of The Budget Deficit. (CNN Poll, 5/24-26/11)

58: Percent Of Americans Disapprove Of Obama’s Handling Of The Economy. (CNN Poll, 5/24-26/11)

44.8: Top Tax Rate Under By 2014 Under Obama’s FY2012 Budget. (The Washington Post, 5/16/11)

38.3: Average Weeks That It Takes To Find A Job. (Bureau of Labor Statistics, 5/6/11)
37: Percent Of Pre-Existing Home Sales In April That Were Distressed Properties. (San Francisco Chronicle, 5/20/11)

27: Straight Months With Unemployment Rate Above 8 Percent. (Bureau of Labor Statistics, Accessed 6/1/11)

15.9: Percent Of Workers Unemployed Or Underemployed. (Bureau of Labor Statistics, 5/6/11)

9.1: Current Unemployment Rate. (Bureau of Labor Statistics, 6/3/11)

$1.95: Increase In The Price Of Gas Since Obama Took Office. (Energy Information Administration, Accessed 6/1/11)

0: Votes Obama’s Budget Received In The Senate. (The Hill, 5/25/11)

0: Other People Obama Will Have Left To Blame For The Failures Of His Economic Policies In 2012. (The American People, 11/6/12)



Thanks to the RNC for putting together most of the extremely well documented info above.

Tuesday, May 31, 2011

Memorial Day - Rememberance, Honor, Gratitude

This year, like almost every other year, my wife, mother-in-law, and whoever is still living at home (in this case Sam), and I travel to Nephi and Levan to visit the resting place of several ancestors on my wife's side of the family. My wife's father passed away suddenly a few years back and it is always a day of reflection as to how our lives might be different if he were still with us, especially for his grandson Sam. But, more importantly we have the opportunity to reflect on how he has had an everlasting impact on our lives even though he is not with us in mortality any longer. I asked my wife about what song she would like to hear him sing... his voice was one of his legacies, she didn't hesitate to respond "How Great Thou Art". A reminder that for this brief moment in mortality that we experience, we have the hope of our Savior who prepares the way for us to be together with our families and our Heavenly Father once again.

My father-in-law was a veteran of World War II. He spent time in Europe fighting for man's right to live free. The cemetery in Levan has a beautiful monument to those from that community that made the ultimate sacrifice. It was remarkable how many, literally dozens, from this small community, lost their lives on the battlefields of war.

I am always amazed and humbled by the men and women who are willing to lay down their life for another in the service of our country, our flag, our families, our beliefs. We know of others who will take their own life and the life of others for their beliefs, however misguided. The difference in my mind is that as Americans we give our life for others in these conflicts... we are givers not takers by tradition, by heritage, and by the very design of our American way of life.

My friend Stan Lockhart reminded me of a wonderful Ronald Reagan quote in speaking of those who have made the ultimate sacrifice.

Ronald Reagan said, “It is, in a way, an odd thing to honor those who died in defense of our country, in defense of us, in wars far away. The imagination plays a trick. We see these soldiers in our mind as old and wise. We see them as something like the Founding Fathers, grave and gray haired. But most of them were boys when they died, and they gave up two lives- the one they were living and the one they would have lived. When they died, they gave up their chance to be husbands and fathers and grandfathers. They gave up their chance to be revered old men. They gave up everything for our country, for us. And all we can do is remember.”

Additionally, I hope we remember and revere those who gave of themselves in the service of our country, the wounded of body, mind, and heart and those who come back whole but affected nevertheless by the horrors of battling evil and hatred. We must remember, revere, and be grateful for all who serve.









Sunday, May 1, 2011

Bin Laden Dead

Congratulations to our military and intelligence communities on successfully eliminating Usama Bin Laden as a personal threat to our security. Though this does not end the threat of Al Quaeda he rother extremists from attacking the U.S., it does end an important chapter in bringing to justice he who planned the attack on the U.S. on 9/11. Hopefully, there is some sense of closure for the families of the victims of that horrific day.
.
Congratulations also to the President of the U.S. for authorizing American personnel to carry out this important mission. He gave credit to President Bush for his efforts and I believe gave one of his most objective and content worthy speeches of his tenure. Though the only time I felt he may have been speaking to shore up his political capital was his repeated use of the "I" pronoun in the middle of his remarks. We all know that this was a ten year effort undertaken by professional and career intelligence and military personnel. Nevertheless, congratulations on the stunning result on his watch.

Hopefully, someday, we wil be able to read about one of the most important covert operations in American history. Oh, and can I say how incredibly impressed I am that this has been kept a secret for a full week... That has to be a first.

Wednesday, December 8, 2010

A Day Late, but then its Never Too Late to Remember

Yesterday we took time to remember the attack on Pearl Harbor and to thank veterans everywhere for their sacrifice. My wife and I visited Pearl Harbor last January and participated in placing a wreath there. I was excited to see they were updating the visitor's center there as it had not been rejuvenated in many years.

I especially enjoyed speaking with the young seamen and women who piloted our boat to and from the memorial. They were young, intelligent, respectful, and from the heartland of America. They were serving out of choice. I am proud of them, those who sacrificed before them and those who sacrifice now. I especially was cognizant of the fact that those who serve in the military have families who love them and worry for them, and some share in the ultimate sacrifice given by a son or daughter.

My prayers and thoughts are with those that serve and those left behind, even if temporarily.

Tuesday, December 7, 2010

RNC to Elect New Officers in January 2011

Every two years, the Republican National Committee (RNC) elects officers to administer the day to day affairs of the party. The RNC has two principle functions, 1st to raise sufficient funds to meet the needs of it's programs to elect Republicans to office each election cycle, and 2nd, to conduct a Presidential Nominating Convention that will effectively showcase its nominee for President of the United States.

The Utah members of the RNC are David Hansen, Utah Republican Party Chairman; Enid Mickleson, National Committeewoman, and Bruce R. Hough, National Committeeman. January 14th will find us in Washington D.C. voting for the new RNC Chairman along with 165 of our RNC colleagues.

Current Chairman Michael Steele has not indicated if he will run for a second term or not. However, in a straw poll held at last Saturday's Utah Republican Party Central Committee, only one member raised their hand when asked if they would support another term by Steele. Everyone else wanted a change in leadership.

Already announced as candidates for the RNC Chairmanship:

Ann Wagner - Former Ambassador to Luxembourg and Missouri State Republican Party Chairman and campaign manager and activist. Wagner successfully chaired the campaign of Senator Elecdt Roy Blount this year. She also served as Co-Chair of the RNC. http://www.annwagner.com/

Saul Anuzis - Former Michigan State Republican Party Chairman, ran for RNC Chair two years ago and was the 4th to drop off the ballot in a 6 person field. Anuzis is known for his porpensity to "tweet" and is new media savvy. A blue collar teamster upbringing, along with his goatee and Harley Davidson adds to his unique persona. http://www.anuzisforchair.com/

Reince Priebus - Current Chairman of the Wisconsin State Republican Party and RNC General Counsel. Priebus enjoyed perhaps the biggest turnaround from a state with mostly Democrats in State and Federal positions to almost all major seats and both houses of the State Legislature converting to Republican. Priebus is highly credited with these major gains including the "early" retirement of Democrat Senator Russ Feingold.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8kkKjNkThhs

Other potential candidates contemplating a run include:

Maria Cino - A former deputy at the RNC, appointee to the Commerce Department, former CEO of the 1998 Republican National Convetion, and well connected political operative. Cino is generally thought of as a skilled manager.

Gentry Collins - The most recently former Political Director for the RNC who wrote a scathing letter to the Chairman Steele the day Gentry resigned.

There are a few others who have had their name floated, including Former RNC Chairman Mike Duncan who spent the last two years raising money for the Karl Rove Crossroads political organization.

It should be a very interesting few weeks leading up to the election.

Monday, December 6, 2010

Tax Policy is Backwards

Does anyone beside me find it incredibly disengenous that we are having an argument (dabate) in congress on how long we should keep the "Bush Tax Cuts"?

Please... someone tell me why these cuts are not permanent, thus requiring Congress to vote to actually Raise Taxes if they have the guts to try at some point in the future. It is ridiculous to argue how long a tax cut should last. The only "sunset" provision that should exist is on a tax hike, not a tax cut!

In fact, the best policy would be to have all fees and taxes subject to a sunset provision so that our elected officials would have to justify any reauthorization on each and every fee and tax. We seem to always think that an increase or new fee or tax will somehow be temporary... they never will be unless they have an automatic sunset provision.

For business and individuals to have the confidence to move forward with creating jobs and investing, we need an environment where we have a more predictable tax policy. Putting time limits on tax cuts does no such thing... it simply creates more uncertaintity.

I understand the point of the extension of unemployment benefits in this negotiation, but if you are going to push for a principled agreement, do not sunset cuts, make them permanent. This makes everyone accountable, especially when there is a desire to increase taxes...

No more phony "expiration" of cuts to get a tax increase without a vote.

Tuesday, August 24, 2010

Women and the Price to Vote

This was sent to me and I tried posting it well before the election. Somehow it remained in the "draft" stage. It is still worth reading.

This is the story of our Mothers and Grandmothers who lived only 90 years ago.


Remember, it was not until 1920 that women were granted the right to go to the polls and vote.



The women were innocent and defenseless, but they were jailed nonetheless for picketing the White House, carrying signs asking for the vote.



And by the end of the night, they were barely alive. Forty prison guards wielding clubs and their warden's blessing went on a rampage against the 33 women wrongly convicted of 'obstructing
sidewalk traffic.'
(Lucy Burns)
They beat Lucy Burns, chained her hands to the cell bars above her head and left her hanging for the night, bleeding and gasping for air.

(Dora Lewis)
They hurled Dora Lewis into a dark cell, smashed her head against an iron bed and knocked her out cold. Her cellmate, Alice Cosu, thought Lewis was dead and suffered a heart attack. Additional
affidavits describe the guards grabbing, dragging, beating, choking, slamming, pinching, twisting and kicking the women.

Thus unfolded the 'Night of Terror' on Nov. 15, 1917, when the warden at the Occoquan Workhouse in Virginia ordered his guards to teach a lesson to the suffragists imprisoned there because they dared to picket Woodrow Wilson's White House for the right to vote. For weeks, the women's only water came from an open pail. Their food--all of it colorless slop--was infested with terrible vermin.



(Alice Paul)
When one of the leaders, Alice Paul, embarked on a hunger strike, they tied her to a chair, forced a tube down her throat and poured liquid into her until she vomited. She was tortured like this for weeks until word was smuggled out to the press.
http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/collections/suffrage/nwp/prisoners.pdf

So, refresh my memory. Some women won't vote this year because -- -why, exactly? We have carpool duties? We have to get to work? Our vote doesn't matter? It's raining?



(Mrs. Pauline Adams in the prison garb she wore while serving a sixty-day sentence.)

Last week, I went to a sparsely attended screening of HBO's new movie 'Iron Jawed Angels.' It is a graphic depiction of the battle these women waged so that I could pull the curtain at the poling booth and have my say. I am ashamed to say I needed the reminder.


(Miss Edith Ainge, of Jamestown , New York )
All these years later, voter registration is still my passion. But the actual act of voting had become less personal for me, more rote. Frankly, voting often felt more like an obligation than a privilege. Sometimes it was inconvenient.


(Berthe Arnold, CSU graduate)


My friend Wendy, who is my age and studied women's history, saw the HBO movie, too. When she stopped by to talk about it, she looked angry. She was--with herself. 'One thought kept coming back to me as I watched that movie,' she said. 'What would those women think of the way I use, or don't use, my right to vote? All of us take it for granted now, not just younger women, but those of us who did seek to learn.' The right to vote, she said, had become valuable to her 'all over again.'

HBO released the movie on video and DVD . I wish all history, social studies and government teachers would include the movie in their curriculum. I want it shown on Bunco night, knitting night, quilting night, (girls night), and any where else women gather. I realize this isn't our usual idea of socializing, but we are not voting in the numbers that we should be, and I think a little shock therapy is in order.




(Conferring over ratification of the 19th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution at National Woman's Party headquarters, Jackson Place Washington , D.C. L-R Mrs. Lawrence Lewis, Mrs. Abby Scott Baker, Anita Pollitzer, Alice Paul, Florence Boeckel, Mabel Vernon (standing, right))


It is jarring to watch Woodrow Wilson and his cronies try to persuade a psychiatrist to declare Alice Paul insane so that she could be permanently institutionalized. And it is inspiring to watch the doctor refuse. Alice Paul was strong, he said, and brave. That didn't make her crazy. The doctor admonished the men: 'Courage in women is often mistaken for insanity.'

Please, if you are so inclined, pass this on to all the women you know. We need to get out and vote and use this right that was fought so hard for by these very courageous women. Whether you vote democratic, republican or independent party - remember to vote.


(Helena Hill Weed, Norwalk , Conn. Serving 3 day sentence in D.C. prison for carrying banner, 'Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed.')


History is being made. VOTE

Wednesday, May 12, 2010

RNC Chooses Tampa for 2012 Presidential Nominating Convention

The last item of business of the Annual RNC Chairman's meeting in Maryland this week was the decision of the Site Selection Committee to contract with the Host Committee of Tampa, Florida for the 2012 Convention.

Salt Lake City and Phoenix were also in the running but it was always Tampa's to lose. This was their third bid and they had an outstanding host committee headed by Al Austin. I got to meet them when I was the Co-Chair of the Site Selection Committee and am confident that they have all the "juice" to make it happen as a first class event. (Now if everyone will please pray that the Hurricane season arrives very late or not at all during the 2012!!)

Once Salt Lake City became a finalist city I was required to recuse myself from the committee as required by party rules.

Congratulations to everyone on the Salt Lake City Host Committee , polictical, governmental, business, convention and visitors bureau, etc. who participated in making Salt Lake City not only a finalist but a real contender. It was clear that the committees visit to Utah was very successful. It was first time visit for many of the committee and they all came away very impressed and convinced that we had the venues, the convention facilities, arena, and infrastructure to put on an outstanding event. Of course the fact that we hosted the Olympics was one of the biggest selling points as well.

As we all know, to get the Olympics we bid several times. This is really no different. You learn some things going through the process so that should we bid again, we would be even more prepared to host a National Convention (Republcan or Democrat... let's face it... I'd be happy to host the Dems here as well... the color of the money they would spend in our community is the same color as Republican money.)

As Scott Beck, the CEO of Convention and Visitor's Bureau indicated to all of us on the Host Committee from the very beginning, bidding on these large conventions sometimes is a 12 to 20 year process. Many conventions are booked out more than a dozen years in advance so an extended timetable for successfully winning a bid such as this is neither unusual nor discouraging.

The good news? We don't need to raise $40m over the next 2 years to put on the event... the bad news is we don't get $170m in economic benefit dropped into our community.

Again, thanks to everyone's great support from my colleagues Chairman of the Utah GOP Dave Hansen and National Committeewoman Enid Green Micklesen, to Scott Beck and his staff at the CVB, Lane Beattie and Natalie Gochnour and their staff and members who participated in hosting the site selection committee, Gail and Greg Miller for sharing the Jazz with the committee one evening and their help in the bid process, Mayors, Legislative leadership, a great legal team led by Todd Weiler, and Governor Herbert and his staff. It was a great team effort and it was one that was surely acknowleged very favorably by the Site Selection Committee. There were many others from the Downtown Alliance to the Boyer Company who helped put on a great show for this bid and I know I have most certainly forgotton many who participated, but know that you are appreciated and that there was real value in this process.

We are definitely on the radar screen nationally and we can always point to our finalist status among 14 cities who had originally indicated an interest in hosting this event.

Good Luck to Tampa!!

Sunday, May 9, 2010

Bennett Out - Bridgewater and Lee in Utah Senate Primary Race

Just a quick observations about the Utah Republican Party Sate Convention yesterday at the Salt Palace in Salt Lake City, Utah where Senator Bennett did not make it out of convention to become a nominee for his 4th term in the U.S. Senate.

1-Chairman Dave Hansen and Executive Director Ivan Dubois did a great job in pulling off a nearly flawless convention. They and the other officers, staff and a myriad of volunteers did yeoman's service and should be congratulated.

2-Senator Bennett is a class act and an honorable public servant. He finished with dignity and gave two of the best speeches I've heard him give. He has done a lot for the state and deserves to be remembered for all the good he has done. The next time you see him, thank him for his service regardless of whether you wanted him to return for a 4th term or not. There is an old saying that you don't shoot a race horse that wins 7 out of ten races. In Bennett's case he had a much better record than even that.

He was a victim of a time when there is deep frustration and distrust of the status quo in Washington. I dare say that if a national referendum were held today, and the question presented was "should we retire the entire congress"... the majority of this country would probably vote yes.

(A side note: Bob was also the victim of out of state organizations who appear to relish in proving their "power" by even taking out Republicans... (Bob Bennett is no Arlen Specter for heavens sake!) I wish they would focus the considerable money and media more on the races where they can support a Republican against a Democrat... so that our numbers in the U.S. Senate and House would improve. I'll still take a "moderate" Republican over a "liberal" Democrat any day of the week!)

Bob was also a victim of Utah's unique "qualifying" caucus-convention system for becoming a candidate of the Republican Party. The caucus-convention system .

3-However, the Caucus-Convention system does exactly what it is intended to do. Make politics accessible to the grassroots of society, without regard to station or wealth. Those who care enough to take less than two hours out of an evening to meet with their neighbors to elect one of themselves whom they trust to represent them at the State Convention is a microcosm of our democratic republic.

Those delegates become the best informed people on the planet regarding the people who have decided to "enter the arena" for statewide or federal office.

I still like this system because it affords anyone to "enter the arena" at an equal footing. You don't have to be politically connected, you don't have to be wealthy, and you don't even need to know what you are talking about... but then I'm not sure that's a real qualification for politics anyway... okay I'm kidding... but guess what, if you aren't delivering ideas and something to vote for you will get weeded out quickly by a group of your peers...

The one thing that might change on the caucus-convention system is going back to a 70% (maybe even 75%) threshold for becoming the nominee without going through a primary. When I was chairman in the early 90's we changed the constitution to lower the threshold to 60% from 70%. The reasoning at that time was because the primary was held in September and the party candidates spent the entire summer beating up on each other to their sometimes mutual self-destruction and at considerable expense, all the while the democrats would field one candidate and not have to worry about a primary and could save their reputations and money for the general.

However, with the primary now being held in June, raising the threshold would not be that detrimental. Candidly (of course if you are the candidate yourself you may not agree), a primary can be a healthy thing. And gives all the Republican voters a chance to choose their ultimate nominee. It also can build good name identification and polish the message that needs to be articulated in the General Election.

4. One vote (or a few, or 167) really does make a difference. This was no more apparent than in a couple of multi-county legislative races. In one race, an incumbent was ousted and the challenger avoided a primary by just one vote. In another, an incumbent took second place and made the primary against his newcomer challenger by just one vote.

But the biggie? The big one was in the Senate race. in the first round 3,414 delegates voted.
In the second round with just Bennett, Tim Bridgewater, and Mike Lee left to garner votes, 3,404 delegates voted. Just a fall-off of 10 votes. Those ten voters left but wouldn't have made any difference had they stated but in the third round... wow....

Nearly 4 of 5 votes cast for Bennett went to Bridgewater. (That says something about the animosity felt between the Bennett and Lee Campaigns I suppose.) But 167 delegates failed to vote in the third round and Bridgewater only needed 89 more votes to 60% Lee and thus avoid a primary. If the ratio of vote switchers even stayed the same, i.e. 4 of 5 votes... Bridgewater would have won if those 167 delegates had stayed to vote. Lee can probably thank those 167 for leaving the convention to keep him alive to battle through a primary with Bridgewater.

4. The Washington Post has a hard time getting a story straight sometimes... (maybe often depending on who you speak with !). They claimed in a story today that a video taped message by Senator Jim DeMint (who is a terrific conservative in the U.S. Senate incidently) on behalf of Candidate Lee received a greater ovation than even that of visiting Mitt Romney who was at the convention to show his support for Bennett. (Side Note: Romney of course knew -who didn't?-that Bennett was in considerable trouble and could have avoided the scene altogether. You have to give him props for showing some loyalty to Bennett who was one of the first to encourage Romney on his Presidential bid.)

Romney of course has been extraordinarily popular in the state, receiving a greater than 90% vote in the presidential primary last. When he introduced Bennett, the audience did not give him more than a polite ovation (but remember, 2/3 of the attendees already had decided to vote for someone other than Bennett... what could they do?).

The fact that DeMint's Video Tape message received a loud ovation was nearly entirely due to the fact that the time keeper held up the"Stop" sign indicating that Candidate Lee's time had expired and the dutiful delegates, as they did with everyone who went over their time, burst into boisterous applause as a sign to please stop NOW!

So, please Washington Post, do not equate DeMint's applause volume as much more than a signal to stop... Mitt still has a hugely popular base in Utah, make no mistake about that.

5-A Message to Tim Bridgewater and Mike Lee. I know you both. I like you both. You are both good men, with wonderful families. Either of you would make me proud to call you my U.S. Senator.

So don't do stupid stuff... The primary should be between two gentlemen of character and honor. Get beyond the convention. Clean Slate. Do not do anything that will bring dishonor to your family name or to yourself. This is an election. It is important. But it is not worth sullying your reputation or disappointing your family by engaging in aberrant election behavior.

I would not take a lot of advice from outsiders who have other agendas at work. I would turn to your values and beliefs and make sure you measure every piece of advice against those.

Make us proud to be an American, a Utahn, and a Republican.

Best of Luck to You Both.

Tuesday, May 4, 2010

Get off your Tush and Do Something: The Patriot's Guide

The Heritage Foundation is a great source of information on policy issues. But the following is a great primer and reminder of what we can actually do right now to make a difference as a citizen. Visit their site for more information at http://www.heritage.org/ . Oh yeah, now GO DO SOMETHING!!!

The Patriot's Guide: What You Can Do for Your Country

Get Involved
Practice the Virtues of Self Governance: 1) Be a responsible citizen; 2) Care for your family; 3) Practice your faith and defend your religious liberty; 4) Join organizations and volunteer in your local community; 5) Start a business and invest in America.

Voice Your Opinion: 1) Vote; 2) Write letters and comment online; 3) Contact your elected officials; 4) Call radio shows; 5) Participate in local town-hall meetings, tea party activism and local assemblies.

Encourage Discussion: 1) Start a blog or Web site; 2) Challenge liberals with fact-based arguments; 3) Encourage the media to represent conservative principles; 4) Encourage candidates and elected representatives to learn more about conservative ideas; 5) Get conservative editorials and letters in your local newspaper; 6) Support teachers, educational programs, and schools that teach the truth about America and its principles.

Spread the Word: 1) Talk to your family and friends; 2) Join social networking sites such as Facebook and Twitter; 3) Bring issues you care about to your civic, social, church, or business groups; 4) Celebrate America’s heritage and distribute pocket Constitutions.

Join the Conservative Movement: 1) Support think tanks and institutions fighting for conservative principles and polices; 2) If you are a student, apply for an internship, such as the year-round program at The Heritage Foundation. These programs are designed to foster young leaders and help them grow as part of the larger conservative movement.

Rediscover the Principles of Liberty
We Still Hold These Truths: The future of liberty depends on reclaiming America’s first principles. Read We Still Hold These Truths: Rediscovering Our Principles, Reclaiming Our Future, a powerful overview of those principles—how they developed, what they mean, and the debate over their status today. Get a copy of the study guide that accompanies the book, appropriate for self-study, as a teaching manual or as the basis for a discussion group.
The Heritage Guide to the Constitution: Free citizens must understand the extent of their rights and the constitutional limits on the powers of government. Get The Heritage Guide to the Constitution, an easy to understand line-by-line examination of the Framers’ Constitution and its contemporary meaning.

Reading the Right Books: Keep reading and learning! Reading the Right Books is an annotated bibliography of thoughtful books (on history, politics, literature, economics, statesmanship, religion, public policy, and modern conservative thought) recommended as a guide for intelligent, conservative-minded readers who want to prepare themselves for a public life of thought and action.

Follow the Important Issues of the Day
Stay Informed:
1) Go to Thomas.gov and review pending legislation; 2) Track local issues with organizations such as the American Legislative Exchange Council or the State Policy Network; 3) Follow several organizations on Facebook and Twitter so you can get all sides to every story.
Find the Organization That Is Right For You: There are many conservative organizations out there. Decide what issues matter most to you, and then support the appropriate institution. Check out http://www.policyexperts.org/ to help narrow your search.

Go to Heritage.org: 1) Sign up for the Morning Bell at Foundry.org; 2) The Foundry blog at Heritage promotes conservative policies and principles by marrying the best in public policy research with every day’s current events; 3) Read and share our Fact Sheets, which give overviews of the complex issues of our day; and 4) InsiderOnline.org maintains a searchable database of policy research, publications, and legal actions throughout the nation.

Sunday, April 4, 2010

Giving to the RNC is a Good Choice


Okay, we get it. A mid-level staffer decides to use her discretion to approve an expense just under her signing authority of $2000 and reimburses a donor for some after hours decadent entertainment. She was wrong to do it and she paid the price by being terminated, because it flat out violated RNC policy and this employee knew better.

The good news is the system worked. That's right it worked. The transparency of what happens to money given to the RNC and expended by the RNC is the sunshine that casts the light of truth on what actually happens. Someone (who was either smart enough - or deviant enough - to know what the Voyeur in West Hollywood was) picked up on a questionable expense. They were able to do that because of transparency.

We ought to applaud the fact that the RNC had a policy forbidding such actions and further did not try to hide, diminish or excuse such a flagrant break with policy. Thank you Chairman Steele for taking swift action and for tasking your staff to further tighten policies to help avoid these incidents from happening again! (had this occurred in another party I'm sure we would have heard something akin to "boys will be boys", blah blah blah... Jay Leno may have had it right when he said, "what do you call republicans that go to strip clubs, (comic timing pause), Democrats!).

The punishment fit the "crime", a staffer who wantonly disobeyed policy and directives was fired when it came to light that she had indeed violated policy and the funds reimbursed are now being repaid to the RNC... Choices have consequences.

So why the moral outrage, the "slashing and burning" of the RNC image and why punish the other employees and members of the RNC, its leadership, and maybe most especially, the candidates who will need the support of the RNC? I suppose the obvious reason is there are many in the media and some political pundits and insiders who will look to any incident and take any opportunity to tear down and denigrate an organzation that has lofty principles, values and ideals. Further, many will delight in it just because it is the RNC. I do understand that when you espouse moral values that you become a target and expectations are higher than if you do not.

But the incident was handled properly by the RNC and I haven't seen any reports from the media who have indicated how effectively the RNC leadership dealt with this aberration of behavior by one of its employees.

Yes, Choices have consequences... but when someone speeds through a school zone, who receives the consequence? The person who broke the rule. Not the legislative body who passed the ordinance, not the police chief who is charged with enforcing the law. When an embezzler is caught, that person is punished, not the other members of the organization. Especially when there are clear rules and policies in place.

Choices have consequences... not giving to the RNC will create consequences indeed. The consequence of not being able to support state and local parties and candidates. Just think of the impact the RNC had on the races in Virginia, Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Massachussets after they contributed 10's of millions of dollars into those states' races! What candidate and party will be negatively affected if people decide not to give to the RNC because of this incident?

If you want to see a return to a more conservative congress and a nation more grounded in the Constitution, then giving to the RNC is a great way to show your support for those principles. The party has raised record dollars this year and spent record dollars in support of Republican candidates and in support of other Republican Parties and Committees. This is no time to slow the momentum, especially when you consider what is at stake in November.

Celebrating Easter... the Foundation of my Faith

In this season of rebirth, as buds reappear on the trees after a long winter, and the blades of grass green, and the plants push through the once frozen soil, we are reminded of He who was dead and yet now lives, even Jesus Christ. But this wonderous event of the resurrection was necessarily preceeded by the sacrifice of our Redeemer and as the hymn reflects my own thoughts,


"I stand all amazed at the love Jesus offers me,
Confused at the grace that so fully he proffers me.
I tremble to know that for me he was crucified,
that for me, a sinner, he suffered, he bled and died.

I marvel that he would descend from his throne divine
To RESCUE a soul so rebellious and proud as mine,
that he should extend his great love unto such as I,
Sufficient to own, to redeem, and to justify.

I think of his hands pierced and bleeding to pay the debt:
such mercy, such love, and devotion can I forget?
No, no, I iwll praise and adore at the mercy seat,
Until at the glorified throne I kneel at his feet.

Oh, it is wonderful that he should care for me Enough to die for me!
Oh, it is wonderful, wonderful to me!" (Charles H. Gabriel 1856-1932)

Know that the promise of the Atonement, begun in Gethsemane and culminating on Golgatha, is for us all, if we will but repent of our transgressions and accept Christ's redeeming power.

It is Christ's suffering that satisfies the law of justice that all sins must be punished, and through his mercy, grace and love, he fulfills that law. How unloving would we be if we allow Him to have suffered on our behalf and having already paid the price, we do nothing? All he asks in return is for us to obey his commandments and repent. By doing so we show our love for all He has done for us and we make effective in our lives His Atonement. This is the road to Eternal Life.

And now on this Easter day we celebrate the gift given to all mankind by the Savior. The Resurrection; the promise that all will live again with a body perfected and immortal.

Knowing that Christ Lives is my testimony. And more, He has provided a way back to live with him and our Father in Heaven through His atoning sacrifice for which "I Stand All Amazed!"
This is my testimony:
"I know that my Redeemer lives. What comfort this sweet sentence gives! He lives, he lives, who once was dead. He lives, my ever living Head. He lives to bless me with his love. he lives to plead for me a bove. he lives my hungry soul to feed. He lives to bless in time of need.
He lives to grant me rich supply. He lives to guide me with his eye. He lives to comfort me when faint. He lives to hear my soul's complaint. He lives to silence all my fears. He lives to wipe away my tears. He lives to calm my troubled heart. he lives all blessings to impart.
He lives, my kind, wise heav'nly Friend. He lives and loves me to the end. He lives, and while he lives, I'll sing. He lives, my Prophet, Priest, and King. He lives and grants me daily breath. He lives, and I shall conquer death. He lives my mansion to prepare. He lives to bring me safely there.
He lives! All glory to his name! He lives, my Savior, still the same. Oh, sweet the joy this sentence gives: "Iknow that my Redeemer lives!" He lives! All glory to his name! He lives, my Savior, still the same. Oh, sweet the johy this sentence gives: "I know that my Redeemer lives!"
(Text: Samuel Medley, 1738-1799; Music: Lewis D. Edwards, 1858-1921)


























Friday, April 2, 2010

Why You Should Give to the RNC

Okay, we get it. A mid-level staffer decides to use her discretion to approve an expense just under her signing authority of $2000 and reimburses a donor for some after hours decadent entertainment. She was wrong to do it and she paid the price by being terminated, because it flat out violated RNC policy and this employee knew better.


The good news is the system worked. That's right it worked. The transparency of what happens to money given to the RNC and expended by the RNC is the sunshine that casts the light of truth on what actually happens. Someone (who was either smart enough - or deviant enough - to know what the Voyeur in West Hollywood was) picked up on a questionable expense. They were able to do that because of transparency.


We ought to applaud the fact that the RNC had a policy forbidding such actions and further did not try to hide, diminish or excuse such a flagrant break with policy. Thank you Chairman Steele for taking swift action and for tasking your staff to further tighten policies to help avoid these incidents from happening again! (had this occurred in another party I'm sure we would have heard something akin to "boys will be boys", blah blah blah... Jay Leno may have had it right when he said, "what do you call republicans that go to strip clubs, (comic timing pause), Democrats!).


The punishment fit the "crime", a staffer who wantonly disobeyed policy and directives was fired when it came to light that she had indeed violated policy and the funds reimbursed are now being repaid to the RNC... Choices have consequences.


So why the moral outrage, the "slashing and burning" of the RNC image and why punish the other employees and members of the RNC, its leadership, and maybe most especially, the candidates who will need the support of the RNC? I suppose the obvious reason is there are many in the media and some political pundits and insiders who will look to any incident and take any opportunity to tear down and denigrate an organzation that has lofty principles, values and ideals. Further, many will delight in it just because it is the RNC. I do understand that when you espouse moral values that you become a target and expectations are higher than if you do not.

But the incident was handled properly by the RNC and I haven't seen any reports from the media who have indicated how effectively the RNC leadership dealt with this aberration of behavior by one of its employees.

Yes, Choices have consequences... but when someone speeds through a school zone, who receives the consequence? The person who broke the rule. Not the legislative body who passed the ordinance, not the police chief who is charged with enforcing the law. When an embezzler is caught, that person is punished, not the other members of the organization. Especially when there are clear rules and policies in place.

Choices have consequences... not giving to the RNC will create consequences indeed. The consequence of not being able to support state and local parties and candidates. Just think of the impact the RNC had on the races in Virginia, Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Massachussets after they contributed 10's of millions of dollars into those states' races! What candidate and party will be negatively affected if people decide not to give to the RNC because of this incident?

If you want to see a return to a more conservative congress and a nation more grounded in the Constitution, then giving to the RNC is a great way to show your support for those principles. The party has raised record dollars this year and spent record dollars in support of Republican candidates and in support of other Republican Parties and Committees. This is no time to slow the momentum, especially when you consider what is at stake in November.